A church tower in Northhampton in the UK got some cheekier projections than they wanted from Aspers Casino nearby
You know very well what they state: sex sells. And with that in your mind, one UK casino in Northampton thought that projecting the image of a model might draw a small awareness of their operation and create some buzz across the city. Unfortunately, the church they decided to show the model on didn’t appreciate obtaining the seductive and image that is suggestive of woman displayed on their clock tower.
Model Citizen, or perhaps Not
The incident started whenever a casino that is local as Aspers decided which they wished to promote their Valentine’s Day ‘strip poker evening’ advertising one that included three models (two feminine, one male). They figured that an alluring 30-foot high projection of just one of the ‘Page 3 girls’ involved will be just the thing to spread your message and generate some interest and excitement about their upcoming event.
What’s less clear is why they decided to project that image on the tower of All Saints, a local northampton church. That led to outrage from church officials, who say they were not consulted for the employment of their building in the stunt.
‘we have been offended that it was done,’ said Father David McConkey, the priest at All Saints. ‘ No permission was gained or sought. We will be grateful for an apology for this misuse of a sacred space.’
McConkey said which he did not understand of the stunt until after parishioners started to contact him, and one eventually showed him a photo of the projection on the tower.
‘It seems really improper to me personally,’ McConkey said. ‘We want this building to be an indication of Jesus in the community. The company hasn’t contacted me personally or asked any permission to do this. I don’t want to look po-faced, but we will never have provided permission for this.’
Diocese Balks (or at Least Wants Re Payment)
The Diocese of Peterborough also weighed in on the issue, saying that even disregarding the content, the methods used by Aspers were highly improper.
‘[The diocese is] disappointed that Aspers Casino has sought to use a church building for advertising a commercial occasion without providing payment and without also having the decency to seek permission first,’ said a diocese spokesperson.
The publicity stunt was not a popular move among locals, either. Local Ruth that is resident Campbell it in fact was a ‘distasteful attack regarding the church and our faith,’ and the group No More web Page 3 which has campaigned to stop the sun’s rays from continuing to publish photos of topless models on page 3 of their newspaper.
‘Good that there surely is been a backlash,’ tweeted No More web Page 3. ‘ Local feminist groups are required for fighting these neighborhood fights too.’
The casino, however, has perhaps not issued a formal apology, though they did declare that the move was not meant to offend anybody from the church or the city.
‘ We did not mean to cause offense in any real way at all and it was purely meant in good spirit,’ an Aspers Casino representative said. ‘Our alternative Valentine’s Strip Poker event on night is a bit of fun and slightly tongue on cheek, plus it is free for all to enter. friday’
Aspers Casino Northampton is just one of four Aspers casinos in the UK. Other locations include Stratford, Newcastle, and a new casino in Milton Keynes.
Aria Casino and MGM Resorts International Could Face Obstruction Fines
A Nevada Gaming Control Board issue against Las vegas, nevada Strip casino Aria and its own partial owner MGM Resorts could cause big fines for the casino company
The Nevada gaming environment is unquestionably one of the most regulated and above-board you will find anywhere; having gone from its start as a cash-skimming free-for-all run by the Mafia up to a legitimate and above-board industry that few could question runs quite transparently and it has many checks and balances to ensure fairness and sincerity in its dealings.
To that end, state video gaming agents receive just about free license to show up unannounced and ensure everything is copacetic in any given casino, and obviously due to its visibility and high gambling volume the Las Vegas Strip is a prime target for these appearances.
Aria Doesn’t Play Ball
However now it would appear that one of these Strip casinos the chi-chi Aria that falls underneath the partial auspices of gaming operator MGM Resorts International is being fined by the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB), following a two-count complaint filed late last week that says two for the state’s video gaming agents were blocked access during the casino from viewing wagering activities, specifically in Aria’s high-limit realms. The issue notes that while two state gaming agents were set up and watching two high-rollers perform roulette in the casino’s exclusive Salon Privé, their view ended up being blocked, rendering it impossible for them to complete their jobs, despite the fact that these were reportedly just ‘5 to 7 foot’ from the gaming area they were wanting to view.
Casinos need certainly to walk a fine line in these matters: protecting and respecting their well-heeled clients’ desires, while also allowing regulatory authorities to do their jobs. In this case, it appears that an Aria supervisor into the room went past an acceptable limit in the previous direction after his consumers told him they ‘did not need to be watched.’
The manager went so far as to inform the agents if they continued to insist on watching that he would call security to intercede between their view and the roulette table play itself.
‘One of the agents asked if all casino games had been available to the general public as well as the agent had been told [that] ‘observation of the roulette game was maybe not welcome,” noted the NGCB report.
Not Their First Rodeo
Incorporating gas for this regulatory fire, according to the issue, is the fact that this is simply not an MGM casino’s first run-in of this kind. The report stated that the casino conglomerate had been previously slapped on the hand for similar violations at other MGM properties players paradise free coins, going straight back as far as 2010, and that the company ‘has historically been [made] aware of the necessity for vigilance in ensuring that people has access to gaming.’
To that end, the report continued, MGM had promised the NGCB at the beginning of last year that these problems were under control, and that at ‘each of the MGM’s luxury properties, such as the Aria, [they would] make sure public access to gaming would not be restricted.’
However, the complaint continued, the ongoing company had nonetheless fallen short when it came to ‘conduct[ing] gaming operations in accordance with proper criteria of custom, decorum and decency.’
In response, MGM Resorts spokesman Gordon Absher said in an email that his operation ‘respects the Gaming Control Board greatly and acknowledge our employee did not follow business procedures in this instance. Aria is focused on a high level of regulatory compliance and looks forward to resolving this matter in the not too distant future. We expect to present this matter towards the Gaming Commission and now we trust that this process will produce a result that is fair provide clarity for all of us dancing.’
With a 50 % ownership stake into the CityCenter development of which Aria is the crown jewel, MGM could now be liable for anywhere from $25,000 as much as $250,000 for all of those counts, unless a settlement is reached before that is determined. If it’s not, a Nevada Gaming Commission hearing date will be planned to ascertain what those fines is.
Connecticut Casinos Hardball that is playing to Unpaid Gambling Debts
While numerous industry experts say that two Connecticut casinos are playing hardball in their gambling debt collection methods, it still beats the way they did it back in the(Image: Casino movie still day)
Two major Connecticut gambling enterprises Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are in the centre associated with the battle for casino licenses in Massachusetts for a while now. Those campaigns have actually required tough negotiating, shrewd land deals, and convincing locals that the specific casino businesses have the region’s best interests in head.
But for some Massachusetts residents whom have run up debts with these same casinos, their collection tactics against some Bay State deadbeats are not quite as warm and fuzzy.
Lien and Mean
According to Massachusetts media reports, the two casinos have combined to spot dozens of liens on homes in that continuing state, in an attempt to collect from gamblers whom couldn’t manage to pay the debts they’d run up by gambling. This tactic has been used for at least a decade, and has sometimes been used to collect from players who owed the casinos less than a few thousand dollars.
‘It’s extremely hardcore predatory behavior,’ said Tom Coates, operator of the credit counseling solution in Iowa.
As an example, take the full case of Louis H. Cutler. He’s a retiree that is 80-year-old lives in Revere and enjoyed playing at both Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods. But in 2006, whenever he couldn’t repay $36,000 that he was lent by the casino to gamble with, Mohegan Sun put a lien on a home that he partially owned.
But that wasn’t the end of Cutler’s dilemmas aided by the casinos. In 2007, Foxwoods found that Cutler had been not likely to pay them straight back either, so they too put a lien on their home so that they can collect an additional $30,600.
For most, tales such as this have led to questions over how gamblers like Cutler are approved for such loans. In 2007, Cutler was forced to seek bankruptcy relief, where he declared that his income that is only was Social safety check for $640 every month. Yet, despite his paltry earnings, he was loaned a total of more than $66,000 from the 2 casinos combined.
Debate Over Industry Tactics
Casinos have always been notoriously aggressive when collecting debts, but this plan may get beyond what most gaming companies are willing to do to get their money back. Industry experts state that going following a gambler’s home in order to collect a debt is virtually unusual.
‘Frankly, I have not heard of any casino company that goes after homes,’ said I. Nelson Rose, an expert and professor on gambling law. ‘It’s really extreme.’
However, the casinos in question say that their tactics aren’t that out of line with other people in the industry, even if they decide to pass a route that is slightly different their competitors.
‘Your inference that our techniques of seeking repayment are somehow more aggressive than other gaming organizations just isn’t accurate,’ said Mohegan Sun chief of staff Charles Bunnell in a letter. Bunnell revealed that in Nevada, unpaid gambling debts are sometimes prosecuted as crimes when they cannot be gathered.
In fact, they are considered bad checks from a legal standpoint, and are generally either settled out of court for undisclosed amounts, or prosecuted, as a recent such case for $12.9 million owed to two major Las Vegas gambling enterprises indicates, among others.
In the case of Cutler, the casino says he first filed for credit with the casino in 1996, and at the time, had plenty of assets to pay back his loan. It wasn’t until 2004 when the debt started initially to accumulate. The casino says they agreed to settle the debt for around 15 % for the total owed, but Cutler declined to do so.
According to casino consultant Gary Green, who’s got previously managed gambling enterprises, players generally leave a check with the casino in exchange for almost any money they are loaned. He says that utilizing a lien to collect a gambling debt is ‘ridiculous.’
‘ From a PR viewpoint, you canot have it both ways,’ Green said. ‘If we will argue to legislators together with public…that we’re an entertainment business, we can’t at the same time be foreclosing on individuals’s houses.’
Foxwoods has so far declined to comment on their collection practices.
We would argue that it’s still gentler than the traditional collection practices from the very early casino days in Las vegas, nevada, where knee caps, fingers and sometimes even lives were taken, and without the anticipatory liens.