The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing sweeping modernization, and it has formally stated its intent to adopt online ticket product sales, as well as offering its own daily fantasy sports and social video gaming services and products.
Massachusetts has been making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for a while, as it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a far more up-to-date and competitive offering that is online.
While Web casino gaming and poker would demand a huge legislative upheaval, DFS and social video gaming wouldn’t normally ( at the very least in the Bay State), plus it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating unique fantasy sports product as an easy method attractive to the younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of newer, mobile-friendly trends.
As a result, their state has launched a formal obtain information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of the Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read an official statement.
This will include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and lottery that is new, including but not limited to social video gaming and daily dream sports choices.’
Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, also as best practices for responsible video gaming controls.
The commission also states that it is looking for ways of integrating lottery ticket stores in order to protect the 7,500-odd businesses that are small rely on lottery sales commissions.
‘We think the development of a dream activities platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace an emerging market while continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the Information Service recently.
‘ This particular form of game would not cannibalize our existing products. It might obviously be a product that is new. It could help us to engage that which we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery to create a new revenue source compared to eroding or maintaining existing offers.’
Throughout the edge in nyc State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is railing from the ‘fraudulent’ nature for the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared that we now have no federal or state rules that preclude such sites from running.
Healy has proposed regulation that is full of, drawing up protocols to protect customers, and has said that state residents who play DFS should ‘not be concerned’ that they are breaking the law.
In the end, there’s nothing incorrect with adopting only a little local innovation, and DraftKings, born and bred in Boston, is maybe benefitting from being a homegrown success story.
India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting
Previous India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the nation legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)
India is club player casino free bonus one step closer to legalizing recreations betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the longstanding gaming ban in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.
Home to over 1.2 billion individuals, India is the second-most populated country in the world.
Now three lawmakers, previous Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized sports gambling would offer more transparency and cut down on rogue backdoor wagering.
‘It [betting] would serve both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market is opened, but only with extensive safeguards in place to make sure that players and those with direct ties to activities matches are banned from participating.
Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.
Though the sport of cricket is no stranger to debate, the events of 2013 were unprecedented.
The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.
The match-fixing that is widespread illegal wagering led the BCCI to do something to enhance its infrastructure and appearance for how to mend its moral standing.
The acts that are criminal triggered intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to eradicate unlawful betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.
BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision
Cricket is the absolute most popular task in India, and while the sport’s governing body claims it wants to clean up its league, the federal government might not be therefore wanting to ending gambling prohibition.
Apart from horse racing, gambling in Asia was illegal for almost 150 years.
In addition to proposing cricket that is legal, Lodha’s outline additionally implies changing the BCCI’s energy structure and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report to date.
The choice to authorize gaming and activities betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on the state and levels that are federal.
‘ The federal government will probably keep it alone since it remains a contentious issue,’ Asia Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.
Gambling has largely been a states’ legal rights topic over the full years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, just three have taken steps to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.
Though gambling can provide substantial revenues and monies for local governments, many in Asia believe any expansion of gambling additionally leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and money laundering.
Lodha argues gambling’s already there, albeit illegally, and that swift action must certanly be taken.
‘With big money and attention, there will not be the necessary caution to protect the sport and its particular players from the orgy of excess,’ he said.
Second PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After Very First Effort Fizzled
Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system day. (Image: pokerstars.com)
A 2nd PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently failing to make a dent that is discernible at minimum on the site’s traffic figures.
Around 1,600 players subscribed to the protest, according to organizers.
The previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same day the previous week per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the first day of the strike, it actually rose on January 2nd, in comparison with the same day.
Of course, it’s impossible to learn just how much the sudden dearth of high stakes players affects PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to stay out have in truth proved true to their word.
The boycott, which is due to finish Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by a number of groups WeArePokerPlayers.com that is including and.com, in addition to an amount of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards a major overhaul to the VIP system, which took effect on January 1st.
PokerStars announced in November that these changes would add scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement with this status being a two-year process.
PokerStars claims that the changes are created to improve the poker ecology, but they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.
While these players represent a few of the website’s avid that is most, long-lasting, and high-ranking players, they are net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the on-line poker giant is anxious to attract.
The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained comparable, except that those high-stakes players were changed with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot prizes.
While PokerStars is probable to have raked less throughout that period, it declared itself vindicated by the boycott december.
‘During the three-day boycott we recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem results of the season with steady net gaming revenue, despite the fact that our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they have all 12 months,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.
More Boycotts Planned
The players that are affected undeterred, but, and are determined to exhibit PokerStars that they can make the operator’s life difficult.
And more boycotts are planned into the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign seeking 5,000 signatures to accept at the very least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have actually recommended that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by as much as 30 %.
On New Year’s Day, Ike Haxton became the second pokerStars that are high-profile to resign in disgust at the changes, following the exemplory instance of Alex Millar, who severed ties utilizing the site right before the holiday period.
‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I know what it requires to rake 1M VPP in a year,’ composed haxton on 2+2. ‘It’s a grind that is tough. For some of the players who do it, it is an all-consuming dedication more intense than most regular jobs.
‘Many of those have actually relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he included. ‘Finding out, just as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded as you expected them to be is brutal. We cannot in good conscience continue to endorse a poker site that treats its players this real way.’